Accountability for violent and racist police practices against the Afro-Brazilians (HRC47, 2021, Joint-OS)

Together with the Marielle Franco Institute and the Institute on Race, Equality and Human Rights (Race and Equality), the joint oral statement with IMADR and Minority Rights Group International on “Accountability for violent and racist police practices against the Afro-Brazilians”  was delivered at the 47th session of the Human Rights Council. Whole text can be read below or download here. 

———

Human Rights Council – 47th Session

Monday 12th July 2021

Interactive Dialogue – Item 9

 

Speaker: Anielle Franco

Madam President,

Black Lives Matter.

This statement is submitted by IMADR, MRG, together with the Marielle Franco Institute and Race and Equality. We thank the High Commissioner for taking up the situation in Brazil in her report, including the case of my sister Marielle Franco.[1]

In recent months, two major incidents have happened in Brazil. On May 6th, the excessive use of police force led to brutal killings of 25 young black men in Jacarezinho, a favela in Rio de Janeiro. It was one of the worst massacres in the city. A month later, on June 8th, Kathleen Romeu, a 24 years-old black pregnant woman was shot dead during an illegal police operation in Complexo de Lins Vasconcelos, also a favela in Rio de Janeiro. Despite the Supreme Federal Court’s injunction to restrict police operations in the city’s favelas during the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 800 people have been killed by the police since June 2020.[2]

These are just some of the cases that indicate that killings of the black population is a systemic issue, promoted by the Brazilian authorities and covered up by the police forces. Instead of investigating the massacres and discriminatory violence against the Afrobrazilian population, the Brazilian government and Police try to legitimize these police operations and attack Brazilian human rights organizations, such as the Marielle Franco Institute.

We urge the State of Brazil to put in place an independent and impartial complaints mechanism inside the police forces that contributes to guarantee accountability and respect for human rights standards, and to ensure that all cases of disproportionate use of force are investigated. We believe that there is no way to have a strong democracy when police forces implementing racist security operations receive more funding than health and education altogether. This is the case for the public budget distribution in the State of Rio de Janeiro in 2020. For this reason, we call on the Government of Brazil to immediately redistribute and dedicate the necessary funding to address inequalities and racial injustice in the law enforcement. These are minimum steps to end what the Inter-American Commission has described as a process of “social cleansing” or even “extermination” of black people in Brazil, “with the consent of the state”.[3]

For all human rights violations and victims of systemic racism, we urge the UN Human Rights Council to work with States in line with the High Commissioner’s recommendations to establish mechanisms and strengthen those that already exist, to support families and communities in accessing truth and justice, reparations and guarantees of non-repetition.

[1] A/HRC/47/53, paragraph 48

[2] https://g1.globo.com/rj/rio-de-janeiro/noticia/2021/04/05/favelas-do-rj-tem-quase-800-mortos-em-acoes-policiais-desde-que-stf-mandou-restringir-operacoes.ghtml

[3] IACHR, Situation of human rights in Brazil, February 12, 2021, par 29. Available at: http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/reports/pdfs/Brasil2021-en.pdf

Share on:

Related Content

Joint NGO report to CERD for the preparation of LOIPR

A list of issues prior to reporting (LOIPR) for Japan, containing 59 items, was adopted by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) during its 116th session. IMADR and the Japan NGO Network for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (ERD-Net) contributed to this process by submitting joint NGO reports. *You can find LOIPR issued by CERD here. ▼ Download our report: Part A (highlighting legal framework in Japan; hate speech and hate crime; racial profiling) Part B (highlighting minorities, including Buraku people, Ainu Indigenous Peoples, people in the Ryukyus and other residents in Okinawa Prefecture, women belonging to minority groups, and returnees from China and their families) Part […]
January 5, 2026

Inside Japan: A Snapshot of Racial Discrimination and Human Rights Challenges

Human rights are under threat all over the world, and Japan is no exception.  The following panels offer a glimpse into the realities of racial discrimination and the ongoing struggle for justice in Japanese society. (*For more details, please click each panel.) *Sayama Case refers to the false conviction of Kazuo Ishikawa, then 24 years old, for the murder of a high school girl in 1963. It was fabricated by the police believing that Burak people can do it. Further information about the rally in the centre of Tokyo in May 2025 can be found here. * One of the key factors behind this impunity is the Status of Forces […]
December 3, 2025

Recap on a Post-CEDAW Event

On 25 January, the Forum of Minority Women* organised an event in Osaka to reflect on and share insights from the recent review of the 9th periodic report of Japan by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). A total of 120 people participated, both in person and online. ◾︎ CEDAW and Women from Marginalised Communities in Japan ◾︎ Firstly, how women from marginalised communities have made their presence and situation visible through their involvement in CEDAW was shared. In 1985, Japan ratified Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. In 2003 (the consideration of the fourth and fifth periodic reports), for the […]
January 31, 2025

Intersectional Feminism- The Interview Series

Although the word, gender equality, is heard more frequently than ever, true gender equality will be realised solely when it is for ‘ALL’ women because women cannot be summed up to one as people have multiple identities. It is minority women whose voices are more silenced and whose rights are more restricted.. Yet, ‘minority women’ are not reducible to one too. Within the ‘minority women’, there is diversity and difference. In the interview series “Intersectional Feminism”, we have a conversation with activists of minority women about their experiences, activities, awareness, and so forth. This series features voices of women of minority groups to comprehend the extent of inequalities, how their […]
March 29, 2024
TOP