Reprisals against indigenous human rights defenders (HRC45, 2020, OS)

September 23, 2020

IMADR delivered the oral statement on “Reprisals against indigenous human rights defenders” at the 45th session of the Human Rights Council. Whole text can be read below or download here.  .

———

Oral Statement: 45th session of the Human Rights Council

Annual half-day panel discussion on the rights of indigenous peoples

23 September 2020

Thank you Madame President,

We welcome the decision of the Human Rights Council to dedicate the issue of indigenous human rights defenders to this annual panel.

We share concerns with the panellists about the prevalence of intimidation, harassment and violence against indigenous human rights defenders.

Indigenous human rights defenders’ engagement with the UN human rights mechanisms including the treaty bodies is crucial at all stages: inter alia, they monitor and report on States’ compliance with their obligations and take follow-up actions to implement recommendations. Their engagement is all the more pertinent where there is no robust regional human rights mechanism.

In this regard, we want to stress the important role played by the UN Voluntary Fund for Indigenous Peoples and the OHCHR Fellowship Programme. The fellowship empowers indigenous human rights defenders with the knowledge of the international human rights system, and the Voluntary Fund allows them to apply such knowledge into practice. IMADR has continuously assisted the beneficiaries to engage with the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD). We strongly encourage Member States to contribute to the fellowship and the Voluntary Fund.

However, when indigenous human rights defenders face reprisals for cooperating with the UN human rights bodies, the impact of these programmes is critically undermined as well as the protection of human rights in countries concerned, as we have seen from the case of indigenous human rights defenders from Russia who engaged with the CERD in 2017.

Against this backdrop, we would like to ask the panellists – What further actions can be taken by the Human Rights Council to ensure State accountability for reprisals against indigenous human rights defenders?

Thank you.

Share on:

Related Content

Joint NGO report to CERD for the preparation of LOIPR

A list of issues prior to reporting (LOIPR) for Japan, containing 59 items, was adopted by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) during its 116th session. IMADR and the Japan NGO Network for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (ERD-Net) contributed to this process by submitting joint NGO reports. *You can find LOIPR issued by CERD here. ▼ Download our report: Part A (highlighting legal framework in Japan; hate speech and hate crime; racial profiling) Part B (highlighting minorities, including Buraku people, Ainu Indigenous Peoples, people in the Ryukyus and other residents in Okinawa Prefecture, women belonging to minority groups, and returnees from China and their families) Part […]
January 5, 2026

Inside Japan: A Snapshot of Racial Discrimination and Human Rights Challenges

Human rights are under threat all over the world, and Japan is no exception.  The following panels offer a glimpse into the realities of racial discrimination and the ongoing struggle for justice in Japanese society. (*For more details, please click each panel.) *Sayama Case refers to the false conviction of Kazuo Ishikawa, then 24 years old, for the murder of a high school girl in 1963. It was fabricated by the police believing that Burak people can do it. Further information about the rally in the centre of Tokyo in May 2025 can be found here. * One of the key factors behind this impunity is the Status of Forces […]
December 3, 2025

Recap on a Post-CEDAW Event

On 25 January, the Forum of Minority Women* organised an event in Osaka to reflect on and share insights from the recent review of the 9th periodic report of Japan by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). A total of 120 people participated, both in person and online. ◾︎ CEDAW and Women from Marginalised Communities in Japan ◾︎ Firstly, how women from marginalised communities have made their presence and situation visible through their involvement in CEDAW was shared. In 1985, Japan ratified Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. In 2003 (the consideration of the fourth and fifth periodic reports), for the […]
January 31, 2025

Intersectional Feminism- The Interview Series

Although the word, gender equality, is heard more frequently than ever, true gender equality will be realised solely when it is for ‘ALL’ women because women cannot be summed up to one as people have multiple identities. It is minority women whose voices are more silenced and whose rights are more restricted.. Yet, ‘minority women’ are not reducible to one too. Within the ‘minority women’, there is diversity and difference. In the interview series “Intersectional Feminism”, we have a conversation with activists of minority women about their experiences, activities, awareness, and so forth. This series features voices of women of minority groups to comprehend the extent of inequalities, how their […]
March 29, 2024
TOP