ICERD and the incompatibility between democracy and racism (HRC31, 2016, OS)

March 18, 2016

IMADR delivered its oral statement on “ICERD and the incompatibility between democracy and racism” at the 31st session of the Human Rights Council. Whole text can be read below or downloaded here

———

IMADR Oral Statement: 31st session of the Human Rights Council

Panel discussion on the incompatibility between democracy and racism

18 March 2016

 Thank you Mr. President,

 We welcome this opportunity to address the incompatibility between democracy and racism at the critical time. Unfortunately, today we are witnessing growing racism and xenophobia in many parts of the world. Too often, political platforms have been used to rouse racism and xenophobia by ultra nationalist and fascist political leaders. These platforms have used hate speech and violent language with impunity. It is unfortunate that public officials disseminating the idea of racial superiority or ideology get away from facing proper sanction, and they continue to spread prejudice and hatred.  Incidents of racial discrimination and hate crimes are reported every day. Racist hate speech in the internet is a particular concern, which severely harms vulnerable groups and divides the society. Yet, access to justice and protection for victims are often limited, while perpetrators enjoy impunity.

Mr. President,

We firmly believe that the full implementation of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) is an essential step to combat racism and promote democracy. While we welcome the ratification by 178 States today, we regret that 85 States have not submitted their initial or periodic report by due date, failing to meet the obligations. Some of those have never submitted a report. We are concerned by their lack of political willingness to combat racial discrimination.

In order to tackle hateful propaganda of racial superiority and discrimination promoted by individuals and groups, States should take policy and legal measures in accordance with the article 4 of the ICERD. The article clearly illustrates that State parties should punish incitement to hatred and racial discrimination, prohibit racist organisations and condemn hateful messages by public authorities. However, many State parties are putting reservation under the article 4 and failing to take effective measures to counter extremism.

Against this backdrop, we would like to ask a question to the panellists:

  1. How can the civil society help States to fulfil the obligations under the ICERD to combat racist extremism in order to promote democracy?

Thank you Mr. President.

Share on:

Related Content

Newsletter E-CONNECT No.40 is out

Feature story CERD 107th session From 8th to 30th August 2022, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) held its 107th session and reviewed implementation status of the International Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) in Azerbaijan, Benin, Nicaragua, Slovakia, Suriname, United States of America, and Zimbabwe. The Committee also sent letters to Australia, Brazil, Canada, and Colombia under its Early Warning and Urgent Action procedure, and released a statement on the events at the Moroccan-Spanish border. On 23 August 2022, the Committee held its Day of General Discussion on racial discrimination and right to health as a part of drafting process of its General Recommendation N° 37. More>> Passing away of Professor Mushakoji Professor Kinhide Mushakoji has exerted himself […]
December 6, 2022
Imadr Logo

Newsletter E-CONNECT No.39 is out

On the 20th of May, we released our new issue of E-CONNECT. If you have not subscribed to our newsletter, you can do it from here! Back number is also available. Feature story CERD 106th session From 11th to 29th April 2022, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) held its 106th session and reviewed implementation status of the International Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) in Cameroon, Estonia, Kazakhstan and Luxembourg. CERD also examined follow-up reports of Czech Republic, Ireland and Peru. A statement on the lack of equitable and non-discriminatory access to COVID vaccines was adopted under the Committee’s Early Warning and Urgent Acton […]
May 20, 2022
Imadr Logo

Newsletter E-CONNECT No.38 is out

On the 14th of December, we released our new issue of E-CONNECT. If you have not subscribed to our newsletter, you can do it from here! Back number is also available. Feature story New! Child-friendly International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) and its standards On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action (DDPA), IMADR and Child Rights Connect launched the child-friendly ICERD and its standards. Developed through consultations with children from various regions, the document is designed as a practical tool to promote awareness of the general public, especially children and youth, on the international human rights […]
December 14, 2021
Imadr Logo

Newsletter E-CONNECT No.37 is out

On the 14th of October, we released our new issue of E-CONNECT. If you have not subscribed to our newsletter, you can do it from here! Back number is also available. Feature story Regressing trends in accountability for enforced disappearances in Sri Lanka At the 48th session of the UN Human Rights Council, the  the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence presented his follow-up report on Sri Lanka. Together with Amnesty International and Forum Asia, IMADR raised alarm over a series of negative developments in accountability for enforced disappearances in the country, including the independence and function of the Office on Missing Persons […]
October 14, 2021
TOP