Arbitrary detention in Okinawa, Japan (HRC42, 2019, OS)

September 13, 2019

IMADR delivered the oral statement on “Arbitrary detention in Okinawa, Japan” at the 42nd session of the Human Rights Council. Whole text can be read below or download here.  All Okinawa Council for Human Rights (AOCHR), an NGO without ECOSOC consultative status, supported the statement.

———

Oral Statement: 42nd session of the Human Rights Council

Item 3: Interactive Dialogue with the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention

13 September 2019

Speaker: Taisuke KOMATSU

Thank you Mr. President,

We thank the Working Group for its continuous efforts to respond to human rights violations suffered by persons deprived of liberty and drawing the attention of States and the international community to their situations. We are deeply concerned by the widespread use of arbitrary detention across regions. In Japan, pre-trial detention can be extended to maximum 23 days for one charge, subjecting suspects to long-hour interrogations without the presence of lawyer. This practice has been widely criticised as “hostage justice”.[1]

The case of Mr. Hiroji Yamashiro, a prominent human rights defender in Okinawa, Japan, was one of the clear examples of “hostage justice”, which he was subject to pre-trial detention for five months for three charges until March 2017. Together with All Okinawa Council for Human Rights (AOCHR), we express our great appreciation to the Working Group’s opinion No. 55/2018 which they declared his detention to be arbitrary and directly connected to his exercise of freedom of expression and peaceful assembly against the constructions of new U.S. military facilities[2].

We echo the Working Group’s observation in the annual report that an increased response rate for follow-up communications does not necessarily translate into implementation. For instance, the Government of Japan updated the Working Group on the Supreme Court‘s decision to reject the appeal of Mr. Yamashiro, but it has failed to implement the recommendations including providing reparations and conducting independent investigations into violations of his rights.

The gap between international human rights standards related to deprivation of liberty and the domestic legal framework in Japan remains wide. In order to close this gap, we urge the Government of Japan to allow the Working Group to undertake a country visit which has been pending since 2015.

Thank you Mr. President.

[1] Japan Federation of Bar Associations (JFBA), Reform of the Criminal Justice System, https://www.nichibenren.or.jp/en/about/activities/Criminal_Justice.html

[2] https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Detention/Opinions/Session82/A_HRC_WGAD_2018_55.pdf

 

Share on:

Related Content

Recap on a Post-CEDAW Event

On 25 January, the Forum of Minority Women* organised an event in Osaka to reflect on and share insights from the recent review of the 9th periodic report of Japan by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). A total of 120 people participated, both in person and online. ◾︎ CEDAW and Women from Marginalised Communities in Japan ◾︎ Firstly, how women from marginalised communities have made their presence and situation visible through their involvement in CEDAW was shared. In 1985, Japan ratified Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. In 2003 (the consideration of the fourth and fifth periodic reports), for the […]
January 31, 2025

Intersectional Feminism- The Interview Series

Although the word, gender equality, is heard more frequently than ever, true gender equality will be realised solely when it is for ‘ALL’ women because women cannot be summed up to one as people have multiple identities. It is minority women whose voices are more silenced and whose rights are more restricted.. Yet, ‘minority women’ are not reducible to one too. Within the ‘minority women’, there is diversity and difference. In the interview series “Intersectional Feminism”, we have a conversation with activists of minority women about their experiences, activities, awareness, and so forth. This series features voices of women of minority groups to comprehend the extent of inequalities, how their […]
March 29, 2024

Sri Lanka: Joint NGO Statement in Solidarity with Sri Lankan Human Rights Defender Ambika Satkunanathan

14 February 2022 JOINT NGO STATEMENT IN SOLIDARITY WITH SRI LANKAN HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER AMBIKA SATKUNANATHAN We the undersigned human rights organizations, express our deep concern about the statement issued by the Sri Lankan Foreign Ministry on February 4, 2022, in which the government denounced testimony given by Ambika Satkunanathan, a leading human rights lawyer, to the European Parliament on January 27. The government statement clearly constitutes an act of harassment and intimidation. We condemn the Sri Lankan government’s tactics to intimidate human rights defenders, and express our full solidarity with Ms. Satkunanathan, a well-known, respected and courageous human rights defender. Targeting her for providing accurate testimony about the human […]
February 16, 2022

Joint NGO Letter: Protect Marginalized Groups in South Korea

IMADR joined the call of international NGOs and coalitions to the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea (South Korea) to immediately adopt a comprehensive antidiscrimination law that prohibits discrimination based on gender, disability, medical history, age, origin, ethnicity, race, skin color, physical condition, marital status, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Letter in English and Korean ——— December 20, 2021 National Assembly of the Republic of Korea 1 Uisadang-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07233 Republic of Korea   Re: Protect marginalized groups in South Korea Dear members of the Legislation and Judiciary Committee and other members of the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea:   On behalf of the 30 signatory […]
December 20, 2021
TOP